Were there ways mentioned in the agreement to solve issues, and did Mr. Chisholm and Mr. Doulton use them?

Were there ways mentioned in the agreement to solve issues, and did Mr. Chisholm and Mr. Doulton use them?

In Chisholm v. Doulton [1890] 22 QBD 736, the case details do not explicitly outline specific mechanisms or provisions within the agreement between Mr. Chisholm and Mr. Doulton for issue resolution. Consequently, there’s no explicit documentation or discussion regarding whether the parties availed themselves of any specified methods to resolve disputes as outlined in their agreement.

The primary focus of the legal proceedings in this case centered on the principle of employer liability for the actions of an employee carried out without the employer’s knowledge or authorization. As a result, the case did not extensively cover the specifics of any issue resolution mechanisms explicitly mentioned in the agreement between Mr. Chisholm and Mr. Doulton.

Therefore, based on the available information regarding Chisholm v. Doulton [1890] 22 QBD 736, there isn’t explicit documentation or legal analysis regarding the existence or utilization of issue resolution methods outlined in the agreement. The case predominantly concentrated on employer liability for the actions of an employee rather than the specific dispute resolution mechanisms delineated in the agreement between the involved parties.