Were the things or services Mr. Doulton provided as good as he said they would be?
In the case of Chisholm v. Doulton  22 QBD 736, the specific details about the quality of goods or services provided by Mr. Doulton aren’t explicitly documented or the focus of the legal proceedings. The case primarily revolved around the legal principle concerning employer liability for the actions of an employee conducted without the employer’s knowledge or authorization.
As such, there’s no explicit information within the case records or discussions that scrutinizes whether the goods or services provided by Mr. Doulton were as good as promised or claimed. The case’s central question concerned the employer’s accountability for the actions of the employee, which were carried out without the employer’s awareness or consent.
Therefore, based on the available information regarding Chisholm v. Doulton  22 QBD 736, there isn’t specific documentation or legal scrutiny about the quality or adherence to promises regarding Mr. Doulton’s goods or services. The case predominantly focused on employer liability rather than the quality of goods or services provided by Mr. Doulton as assured or claimed.