Was the heavy rainfall that caused the lakes to burst an unforeseeable and exceptional event?

Was the heavy rainfall that caused the lakes to burst an unforeseeable and exceptional event?

Yes, according to the judgment in Nichols v Marsland [1876] 2 Ex. D. 1, the heavy rainfall that led to the lakes bursting was considered an unforeseeable and exceptional event. The amount of rainfall experienced was far beyond what could have been reasonably anticipated or expected, making it an extraordinary natural occurrence that couldn’t have been predicted or prepared for by Marsland or anyone else in the area.