Principle of Natural justices

Introduction to the Principle of Natural Justice: The Principle of Natural Justice serves as a bedrock in legal systems, embodying the fundamental tenets of fairness, equity, and due process. It consists of two core principles— the right to be heard (audi alteram partem) and impartiality (nemo judex in causa sua)—which collectively ensure that legal and … Read more

“Act Exteriora Indicant Interiora Secreta” (Acts indicate the intention)

Introduction: The legal maxim “Act Exteriora Indicant Interiora Secreta,” translated as “Acts indicate the intention,” encapsulates a fundamental principle in law and philosophy. At its essence, this maxim suggests that one’s external actions provide a glimpse into their internal thoughts and intentions. In simpler terms, it implies that what a person does outwardly can reveal … Read more

“Actio Personalis moritur cum persona,” (“A personal right of action dies with the person.”)

Introduction: The legal maxim “Actio Personalis moritur cum persona,” originating from Latin, translates to “A personal right of action dies with the person.” This principle holds a profound significance in the realm of law, shaping how certain legal rights are treated upon an individual’s demise. In simpler terms, it signifies that certain legal actions tied … Read more

“Actus Dei Nemini Facit Injuriam,”(“The act of God causes no harm to anyone.”)

Introduction:- In the realm of law, there exists a guiding principle known as “Actus Dei Nemini Facit Injuriam,” which translates to “The act of God causes no harm to anyone.” This legal maxim reflects a profound concept that acknowledges the limitations of human responsibility in the face of unforeseen and uncontrollable natural events. The essence … Read more

Hobbs v Winchester Law Society (1933) 98 JP 33

Case Name:– Hobbs v Winchester Law Society Citation:– [1933] 98 JP 33 Jurisdiction:– England and Wales Judgment:– The case dealt with the possession of an altered passport by the accused. Despite the accused’s lack of knowledge or suspicion of the alteration, the court held that possessing an altered passport constituted an offense. The judgment established … Read more

Nichols vs Marsland [1876] 2 Ex. D. 1

Case Name:- “Nichols v Marsland.” Citation:- “[1876] 2 Ex. D. 1.” Jurisdiction:- This case was heard in the Court of Exchequer Division in England. Judegment:-The judegment in Nichols v Marsland [1876] 2 Ex. D. 1 ruled in favor of the defendant, Marsland, stating that he was not liable for the damage caused by the escape … Read more

Tarapore & Co., Madras vs. M/S. V/O Tractors Export, Moscow 1970 AIR 891, 1969 SCR (2) 920

Case Name: Tarapore & Co., Madras vs. M/S. V/O Tractors Export, Moscow Citation: 1970 AIR 891, 1969 SCR (2) 920 Jurisdiction: This case was heard in the Supreme Court of India. Judgement: The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Tarapore & Co., Madras, stating that the contract was frustrated due to the Indian … Read more