Chisholm v. Doulton [1890] 22 QBD 736.

Case Name:- Chisholm v. Doulton Citation:- [1890] 22 QBD 736. Jurisdiction:- United Kingdom (UK) Judgment:- The judgment found that a master cannot be held criminally responsible for acts committed by a servant without the master’s knowledge or authorization, in accordance with the principle “Actus non facit reum, Nisi mens sit rea” (An act does not … Read more

Hobbs v Winchester Law Society (1933) 98 JP 33

Case Name:– Hobbs v Winchester Law Society Citation:– [1933] 98 JP 33 Jurisdiction:– England and Wales Judgment:– The case dealt with the possession of an altered passport by the accused. Despite the accused’s lack of knowledge or suspicion of the alteration, the court held that possessing an altered passport constituted an offense. The judgment established … Read more

Lamond vs. Richard [1897] 1 QB 541

Case Name: Lamond v. Richard Citation: [1897] 1 QB 541 Jurisdiction: England and Wales (United Kingdom) Judgement: The judgment in this case established the principle that travelers have the right to access and seek refreshments in public restaurants. It affirmed that public establishments, including restaurants, are obligated to serve travelers and cannot deny them service … Read more