Did Mr. Doulton finish his responsibilities within the times they agreed upon?
In the case of Chisholm v. Doulton  22 QBD 736, the details concerning whether Mr. Doulton completed his responsibilities within the agreed-upon timeframes are not explicitly discussed or documented. The case primarily focused on the principle of employer liability for the actions of an employee conducted without the employer’s knowledge or authorization.
Specific information regarding Mr. Doulton’s adherence to the agreed-upon timelines or whether he completed his responsibilities within the stipulated timeframes isn’t detailed in the available case records. The legal proceedings mainly centered around the question of whether an employer could be held accountable for the actions of an employee carried out without the employer’s awareness or consent.
Therefore, based on the available information regarding Chisholm v. Doulton  22 QBD 736, there isn’t specific documentation or legal discussion pertaining to Mr. Doulton’s completion of responsibilities within agreed-upon timeframes. The case primarily focused on employer liability rather than the timeliness of Mr. Doulton’s performance within stipulated deadlines.